Pattern Recognition

The method has been tested across institutions.

Each case below names the organisation type, revenue scale, the structural misfit identified, the redesign decision the board took, and the outcome twelve to twenty-four months later. Additional client cases are in development. Reference clients confirmed Q2 2026.

Case 01 · Community Institution

Pamilacan Island

Organisation typeCommunity marine conservation
LocationPhilippines
Scale1,500 people
Time horizon24 years tracked
The Structural Misfit

Operating model collapsed in 1998 when the Philippine government banned marine mammal hunting. The community's primary income source became illegal. The institution had no capability for the redesign.

The Redesign Decision

Fifty per cent of the community worked through the three-phase framework systematically: decommissioned the hunting economy (RAZE), built ecotourism capability and community governance (ENRICH), emerged as the leading ecotourism institution in the region (GROW). Thirty per cent resisted and demanded the prior state be restored. Twenty per cent survived without redesigning.

The Outcome

The co-creating cohort now runs one of the region's most-visited ecotourism operations. The resistant cohort declined. The surviving-without-redesign cohort plateaued. The pattern predicted by the framework held across twenty-four years.

Reference

Green, S.J. (2002). Marine Ecotourism and Community Participation: Case Studies from Bohol, Philippines.

Case 02 · In Development

Additional institutional case to be released.

Reference client engagement under confidentiality. Full case details publishable Q2 2026.

Case 03 · In Development

Additional institutional case to be released.

Reference client engagement under confidentiality. Full case details publishable Q2 2026.